atx crypto club

indigenous

#indigenous

Anon Ymous

Sat Sep 3 20:43:44 2022
(*f7c25ac5*):: +public!
(*f7c25ac5*):: So how / why are the indigenous getting a seat at the table with the “underserved”?
(*f7c25ac5*):: How does the indigenous help with black repetitions for slavery?
(*f7c25ac5*):: I’m looking into legal cases. Starting to see a pattern. Where that pattern leads? I do not know.
(*f7c25ac5*):: How does the UN benefit by playing up the indigenous card?
(*4e3d9761*):: Its packaged up with their ‘equity’ strategy, which is just an excuse to seize more power as we go through agenda 2030
(*f7c25ac5*):: How long, in todays fast paced society, will custom to mature into common law? +public!
(*f7c25ac5*):: In English law, time immemorial ends and legal memory begins at 1189 A.D., the end of the reign of King Henry II, who is associated with the invention of the English common law. +public!
(*f7c25ac5*):: The Prescription Act 1832, which noted that the full expression was “time immemorial, or time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary,” replaced the burden of proving “time immemorial” for the enjoyment of particular land rights with statutory fixed time periods of up to 60 years +public!
(*f7c25ac5*):: [ ] I still need to go through the prescription act
(*f7c25ac5*):: +public! In Knowles v. Dow, a New Hampshire court found that 20 years suffices to demonstrate a legal custom dating back to “time immemorial.”
(*f7c25ac5*):: So what legal customs do we have today?
(*f7c25ac5*):: +public! “Time Immemorial” is sometimes used to describe the priority date of water rights holders. In the westernUS , water rights are administered under the doctrine of prior appropriation
(*f7c25ac5*):: Under prior appropriation, water rights are acquired by making a beneficial use of water +public!
(*f7c25ac5*):: This where I think things get tricky
(*f7c25ac5*):: Winters v. United States , 207 U.S. 564 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case clarifying water rights of American Indian reservations. This doctrine was meant to clearly define the water rights of American Indians in cases where the rights were not clear.

Back to top