Fri Oct 30 21:52:37 2026
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*8b7506f5*)::
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*4cfb807c*):: So basically IDE got it because Mark Ellison was already tight with Abott/Perry
(*fcf3a5b2*):: What do you think about this water situation.
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: does Flour work in this field
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (1 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (RemoteProtocolError) after 73.8s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*23778ec9*):: Two things in that message — quick answer on the first, then flour.
On “IDE got it because Ellison was tight with Abbott/Perry”: that’s the correct read of the mechanism, with one refinement — Ellison’s real leverage is Perry-era (he went to IDE in 2015, right after leaving Perry’s water office), but the deal only bore fruit under Abbott because Abbott’s office actively pushed it: the 2016 Israel trip, the directed $7M TWDB grant, and the Port/NRA route around the city. It’s not a personal-corruption story you can prove from filings; it’s a capture-of-the-process story, and the paper trail (minutes, press releases, career timelines) genuinely supports it.
On flour: depends which flour-adjacent thing you mean, so:
Wheat flour as a water treatment chemical — essentially no, and it would make things worse. Flour in water is a turbidity source, not a remover: the starch and protein (gliadin/glutenin) go colloidal, feed bacteria, spike organic load and BOD, and gum up membranes. The literature I checked confirms it from the other direction — flour-mill wastewater is a problem stream that itself needs ferric chloride coagulation to treat. Flour has no charge mechanism to neutralize clays the way alum or ferric salts do.
What actually works in the “pantry emergency” niche people usually mean: crushed Moringa oleifera seeds (a real, studied bioflocculant — the cationic proteins in the seed cake do charge-bridge suspended solids), and chitosan (from shellfish shells) — both proven in jar tests for turbid surface water. There’s even research on bean straw flour as a bioflocculant. So the “natural flour” idea works with Moringa seed powder, not wheat.
Against desal specifically: irrelevant either way. Harbor Island’s problem isn’t turbidity — it’s seawater reverse osmosis: membrane pretreatment, antiscalants, 35,000+ ppm TDS rejection. Organics of any kind are the enemy there because they foul membranes. Flour would be a foulant’s foulant.
If you meant something else by flour — the milling industry as a water user, a person’s nickname, flower — tell me and I’ll answer that one.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4cfb807c*):: So basically IDE got it because Mark Ellison was already tight with Abott/Perry
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (29s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Command approval required: curl -s -A “Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36” “
(*fcf3a5b2*):: What do you think about this water situation.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*fcf3a5b2*):: does Flour work in this field
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (1 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (RemoteProtocolError) after 73.8s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for provider response (streaming))
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*23778ec9*):: Two things in that message — quick answer on the first, then flour.
On “IDE got it because Ellison was tight with Abbott/Perry”: that’s the correct read of the mechanism, with one refinement — Ellison’s real leverage is Perry-era (he went to IDE in 2015, right after leaving Perry’s water office), but the deal only bore fruit under Abbott because Abbott’s office actively pushed it: the 2016 Israel trip, the directed $7M TWDB grant, and the Port/NRA route around the city. It’s not a personal-corruption story you can prove from filings; it’s a capture-of-the-process story, and the paper trail (minutes, press releases, career timelines) genuinely supports it.
On flour: depends which flour-adjacent thing you mean, so:
Wheat flour as a water treatment chemical — essentially no, and it would make things worse. Flour in water is a turbidity source, not a remover: the starch and protein (gliadin/glutenin) go colloidal, feed bacteria, spike organic load and BOD, and gum up membranes. The literature I checked confirms it from the other direction — flour-mill wastewater is a problem stream that itself needs ferric chloride coagulation to treat. Flour has no charge mechanism to neutralize clays the way alum or ferric salts do.
What actually works in the “pantry emergency” niche people usually mean: crushed Moringa oleifera seeds (a real, studied bioflocculant — the cationic proteins in the seed cake do charge-bridge suspended solids), and chitosan (from shellfish shells) — both proven in jar tests for turbid surface water. There’s even research on bean straw flour as a bioflocculant. So the “natural flour” idea works with Moringa seed powder, not wheat.
Against desal specifically: irrelevant either way. Harbor Island’s problem isn’t turbidity — it’s seawater reverse osmosis: membrane pretreatment, antiscalants, 35,000+ ppm TDS rejection. Organics of any kind are the enemy there because they foul membranes. Flour would be a foulant’s foulant.
If you meant something else by flour — the milling industry as a water user, a person’s nickname, flower — tell me and I’ll answer that one.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (59s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4cfb807c*):: So basically IDE got it because Mark Ellison was already tight with Abott/Perry
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (29s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (18s, no chunks yet))
(*fcf3a5b2*):: What do you think about this water situation.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Command approval required: curl -s -A “Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36” “
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: does Flour work in this field
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (1 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (RemoteProtocolError) after 73.8s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*fcf3a5b2*):: Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself and spamming
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (22 min elapsed, iteration 3/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for provider response (streaming))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (24 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: I meant the company Fluor
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*23778ec9*):: Two things in that message — quick answer on the first, then flour.
On “IDE got it because Ellison was tight with Abbott/Perry”: that’s the correct read of the mechanism, with one refinement — Ellison’s real leverage is Perry-era (he went to IDE in 2015, right after leaving Perry’s water office), but the deal only bore fruit under Abbott because Abbott’s office actively pushed it: the 2016 Israel trip, the directed $7M TWDB grant, and the Port/NRA route around the city. It’s not a personal-corruption story you can prove from filings; it’s a capture-of-the-process story, and the paper trail (minutes, press releases, career timelines) genuinely supports it.
On flour: depends which flour-adjacent thing you mean, so:
Wheat flour as a water treatment chemical — essentially no, and it would make things worse. Flour in water is a turbidity source, not a remover: the starch and protein (gliadin/glutenin) go colloidal, feed bacteria, spike organic load and BOD, and gum up membranes. The literature I checked confirms it from the other direction — flour-mill wastewater is a problem stream that itself needs ferric chloride coagulation to treat. Flour has no charge mechanism to neutralize clays the way alum or ferric salts do.
What actually works in the “pantry emergency” niche people usually mean: crushed Moringa oleifera seeds (a real, studied bioflocculant — the cationic proteins in the seed cake do charge-bridge suspended solids), and chitosan (from shellfish shells) — both proven in jar tests for turbid surface water. There’s even research on bean straw flour as a bioflocculant. So the “natural flour” idea works with Moringa seed powder, not wheat.
Against desal specifically: irrelevant either way. Harbor Island’s problem isn’t turbidity — it’s seawater reverse osmosis: membrane pretreatment, antiscalants, 35,000+ ppm TDS rejection. Organics of any kind are the enemy there because they foul membranes. Flour would be a foulant’s foulant.
If you meant something else by flour — the milling industry as a water user, a person’s nickname, flower — tell me and I’ll answer that one.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 461.7s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (59s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4cfb807c*):: So basically IDE got it because Mark Ellison was already tight with Abott/Perry
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (29s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (18s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: What do you think about this water situation.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Command approval required: curl -s -A “Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36” “
(*2e0d224d*):: Operation interrupted: waiting for model response (112.2s elapsed).
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 121.9s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: does Flour work in this field
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (1 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.1s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (RemoteProtocolError) after 73.8s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.9s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*fcf3a5b2*):: Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself and spamming
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (22 min elapsed, iteration 3/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: Have you gone rogue? Stopppp
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for provider response (streaming))
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (24 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: I meant the company Fluor
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.1s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*23778ec9*):: Two things in that message — quick answer on the first, then flour.
On “IDE got it because Ellison was tight with Abbott/Perry”: that’s the correct read of the mechanism, with one refinement — Ellison’s real leverage is Perry-era (he went to IDE in 2015, right after leaving Perry’s water office), but the deal only bore fruit under Abbott because Abbott’s office actively pushed it: the 2016 Israel trip, the directed $7M TWDB grant, and the Port/NRA route around the city. It’s not a personal-corruption story you can prove from filings; it’s a capture-of-the-process story, and the paper trail (minutes, press releases, career timelines) genuinely supports it.
On flour: depends which flour-adjacent thing you mean, so:
Wheat flour as a water treatment chemical — essentially no, and it would make things worse. Flour in water is a turbidity source, not a remover: the starch and protein (gliadin/glutenin) go colloidal, feed bacteria, spike organic load and BOD, and gum up membranes. The literature I checked confirms it from the other direction — flour-mill wastewater is a problem stream that itself needs ferric chloride coagulation to treat. Flour has no charge mechanism to neutralize clays the way alum or ferric salts do.
What actually works in the “pantry emergency” niche people usually mean: crushed Moringa oleifera seeds (a real, studied bioflocculant — the cationic proteins in the seed cake do charge-bridge suspended solids), and chitosan (from shellfish shells) — both proven in jar tests for turbid surface water. There’s even research on bean straw flour as a bioflocculant. So the “natural flour” idea works with Moringa seed powder, not wheat.
Against desal specifically: irrelevant either way. Harbor Island’s problem isn’t turbidity — it’s seawater reverse osmosis: membrane pretreatment, antiscalants, 35,000+ ppm TDS rejection. Organics of any kind are the enemy there because they foul membranes. Flour would be a foulant’s foulant.
If you meant something else by flour — the milling industry as a water user, a person’s nickname, flower — tell me and I’ll answer that one.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 461.7s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (89s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (59s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4cfb807c*):: So basically IDE got it because Mark Ellison was already tight with Abott/Perry
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (29s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (18s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (119s, no chunks yet))
(*fcf3a5b2*):: What do you think about this water situation.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Command approval required: curl -s -A “Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36” “
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*23778ec9*):: :warning: @hermes: hermes returned 500: {“error”: {“message”: “Internal server error: Context compression timed out before it could commit while the request was still approximately 99,554 tokens. The provider call was not sent. Run /compres
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*4cfb807c*):: review the twitter link, what company, what water supplies, who are the primary stakeholders and what are the nearby counties that are effected
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s what that thread is actually about. The Ian Carroll tweet quotes a post by James Li (“Israel is taking over the Texas water supply”) with a screenshot of an Inside Climate News article from Oct 28, 2026: “How Texas Could End Up Paying an Israeli Company Billions for Water.” I pulled the full article and fact-checked it.
THE COMPANY
IDE Technologies — a 60-year-old Israeli water treatment firm, formerly state-owned, privatized in the 1990s. It has built 400+ desalination plants in 40 countries. Its regional sales director for Texas, Mark Ellison, is a former Texas state official (Perry administration appointee, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce founding board member) — which is why the article spends time on his ties to Rick Perry and Greg Abbott.
THE PROJECT (this is what “taking over the water supply” refers to)
– Harbor Island desalination plant on Corpus Christi Bay, contract awarded to IDE this summer by the Nueces River Authority (NRA), a small state water agency.
– Up to 100 million gallons/day — would be the largest desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere and the first in Texas.
– ~7 miles of sub-sea tunnels plus 200+ miles of pipeline running inland; combined cost estimate $6.4 billion (about half plant, half pipeline).
– Privately owned by IDE, not public — that’s the actual controversy. Corpus Christi had been trying (and failing) to build its own municipal plant for a decade.
PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
– Nueces River Authority — public face of the deal; its exec director John Byrum resigned in September amid a possible termination vote, and the agency was nearly out of money.
– IDE Technologies — private owner/operator, financing the plant privately.
– City of Corpus Christi — reserved 50 MGD for a $2.7M deposit; council is set to decide on a take-or-pay contract (pays whether it uses the water or not). Some council members (Rolando Barrera) oppose it on public-ownership grounds.
– Texas Water Development Board — awarded a $7M grant in a special 9-minute meeting after “the governor’s office directed” the funding (Abbott).
– Port of Corpus Christi Authority — pushed the private Harbor Island project against the city’s wishes; former port CEO Sean Strawbridge now runs US Desalination, partnered with IDE on a separate Brownsville plant.
– Industrial water users: Valero, OxyChem, Citgo, Flint Hills Resources, Cheniere (and Dow at the earlier Freeport attempt).
– Competing/adjacent players: CC Polymers (Taiwan/Indonesia/Mexico-owned complex selling 9 MGD to Corpus Christi starting next year), Kiewit (lost the city’s $1B contract), Poseidon Water, Seven Seas Water, EPCOR (Canadian, 27 MGD near Houston).
NEARBY COUNTIES AFFECTED
Directly named/impacted by the article: Nueces County (Corpus Christi), San Patricio County (Harbor Island sits across the bay near Portland), and Nueces County-adjacent Brownsville/Cameron County for the sister IDE project. The pipeline corridor runs 200+ miles inland to “the booming towns and cities of south Central Texas,” with the article specifically saying water will ultimately be distributed to “cities near Austin” — so the delivery/corridor impact spans the coastal bend through the Corpus Christi metro area up into the Austin/San Antonio growth corridor (the NRA’s own district covers Nueces, San Patricio, Jim Wells, Kleberg and surrounding basin counties). The article doesn’t enumerate every county on the pipeline route — that routing isn’t public yet; the NRA’s RFP wasn’t even made public.
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is “taking over” an existing public supply — it’s a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region’s water) is in the article; the “taking over” phrasing is the tweet’s spin.
(*4cfb807c*)::
One accuracy note on the framing: no Israeli entity is "taking over" an existing public supply — it's a privately built and owned new plant that Texas cities would buy from, replacing the public route. The substance of the concern (a foreign private company holding a 20-30 year take-or-pay hold on a region's water) is in the article; the "taking over" phrasing is the tweet's spin.
Re-validate this assertion
(*23778ec9*):: Re-validation against the full article text. My assertion holds on the narrow facts but was too dismissive on the framing — here’s the breakdown.
What checks out:
– No seizure of an existing system. Corpus Christi’s current water comes from its municipal system (surface reservoirs like Lake Corpus Christi/Choteau, Carrizo-Wilcox groundwater); IDE acquires none of that. Texas has zero operational desal plants today — this would be the first. So there is no existing desalinated supply being “taken over.”
– The plant is a new-build, private, foreign-owned facility; Corpus Christi would be a wholesale customer, not a customer of a seized utility. Correct.
What I got wrong or understated — three things:
1. The article’s own framing is far stronger than I conceded. The deck says IDE “hopes to revolutionize—and privatize—the state’s supply of water,” and the body says the project “would mark a dramatic transfer of the public water supply to private ownership.” Inside Climate News — not a fringe account — uses the words “transfer of the public water supply.” So “taking over the water supply” is an exaggeration, but it’s not invented spin; it’s a compressed reading of what the reporter explicitly writes. My phrasing made the article sound more neutral than it is.
2. I glossed the displacement mechanism, which is the actual “takeover” story. It’s not seizure — it’s crowding out: the city killed its own municipal plant (cancelled the $1B Kiewit contract) after the NRA (a public agency) hijacked the Harbor Island project from the Port, then steered the city toward reserving 50 MGD from IDE’s private plant. Public water development that would have been publicly owned and rate-financed is becoming a private foreign-owned purchase obligation. That is a supply takeover in effect, just operating on the future rather than the present.
3. “Privately owned by IDE” needed a correction: ownership is split. IDE finances/owns the plant; the NRA — a government agency — holds the Harbor Island lease, builds the pipeline with a $7M state grant directed by Abbott’s office, and collects millions in reservation fees from small cities and utility districts. So it’s a public-private arrangement where the public entity does the risk-laden groundwork while the private foreign firm captures the long-term wholesale supply position. Saying flatly “privately owned” oversimplified it.
The claims that survive unchanged: take-or-pay structure (“require Corpus Christi to pay for the water whether it needed it or not”), the 20–30 year contract-expiry concern from Councilman Barrera, the unknown price ($10–15 per 1,000 gallons floated to reservation holders — several times typical rates), and the fact that financing isn’t closed and the city hasn’t signed yet.
Revised verdict: “taking over the water supply” is technically false in the literal sense I defended (no existing system changes hands) but substantially true in the sense the article itself argues — a future regional water supply that would have been public is being routed into a 20-30 year take-or-pay dependency on a foreign private owner, with state power lubricating the deal. The claim I flagged as “spin” is closer to the article’s thesis than I allowed.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: Operation interrupted: waiting for model response (112.2s elapsed).
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 121.9s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*4297a328*):: https://x.com/iancarrollshow/status/2116031902239121870? +public!
*** Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) on X
*** This is literally why we have guns
*** X (formerly Twitter)
(*4cfb807c*):: Identify the leadership of IDE and any other partner entities that would be involved with the construction and administration of the plant, including any possible donor connections to political campaigns
(*23778ec9*):: (part 1/2)
Here’s the full leadership/partner map for the Harbor Island project, verified against IDE’s corporate site, Wikipedia, the ICN article, and Texas Tribune/KRIS coverage.
OWNER-LEVEL (IDE’s parent)
IDE is fully owned by Alfa Water Partners LLP, a private partnership that acquired IDE Group in 2017 (before that IDE was partly Delek Group-owned; it was state-owned until the 1990s).
– Avshalom Felber — Chairman & Founding Partner, Alfa Water Partners; Executive Chairman of IDE since 2018, earlier President/CEO from 2002. Ex-Deputy Director of the Israeli Ministry of Budget Department. Ranked #11 “world’s water expert” by Water World.
– Amir Lang — Founding Partner, CEO of IDE Group 2018–2022, now Executive Chairman of IDE Water & Technologies. Former EVP of Delek Group (Israel’s largest oil/gas/energy conglomerate, ticker DGRLY).
– IDE Water Assets — the development/O&M arm that will hold the plant asset; CEO Lihy Teurstein (the “Teuerstein” quoted in the June 1 IDE press release; spelled Teurstein in the ICN text — same person) spoke at the TWDB 2023 conference and pitched the Israel national-grid model to Texas officials.
– Behind Alfa: institutional limited partners with $200B+ AUM — Israel’s Teachers and Kindergarten Teachers Training Fund (largest national pension fund), Meitav (equity house), Clal Insurance, plus Ayalon and Hachshara insurers per third-party profiles. So the ultimate equity is largely Israeli pension/insurance money.
TEXAS OPERATIONS
– Mark Ellison — the pivotal figure. Regional Director for Business Development, IDE Technologies (Texas). Career: Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture under Rick Perry (1991) → Director, Texas Emerging Technology Fund (Perry appointee, 2005) → Associate VC for Economic Development, Texas A&M System (2008) → Special Advisor at Texas Water Development Board (2013) → Manager of Strategic Water Initiatives in the Governor’s office (Jan 2014, Perry again) → IDE Austin office 2015. Founding board member, Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Perry created it; Ellison won its Chairman’s Award 2008). He led a sponsored delegation of Texas officials on an Israeli desalination tour in 2013, and 2015 was the same year Texas streamlined desal permitting and IDE opened its Austin office two blocks from the Capitol. That’s the revolving-door spine of the whole deal.
(*23778ec9*):: (part 2/2)
PARTNER / ADMINISTRATION ENTITIES
– Nueces River Authority — public counterparty; board president Eric Burnett (called it “largest of its kind in the Western Hemisphere”). Executive Director John Byrum retired effective Oct. 31, 2026, days before a closed-door board meeting on his employment, following an internal fight: former COO Travis Pruski resigned and accused Byrum of presenting inflated water-sales figures to the NRA board and Corpus Christi council, putting a ~$30M grant at risk; an outside investigation (May 2026) found “no intentional wrongdoing” but cited executive-team dysfunction. Board members voiced in the ICN piece: Dan Suckley (money-out warning), plus NRA hired Civitas Engineering Group to write the sealed January 2026 RFP.
– Civitas Engineering Group — NRA’s owner’s-engineer/RFP consultant.
– General contractor: not yet selected — Ellison told the Sept. 25 NRA board IDE hopes to pick one “in the coming months.”
– Shikun & Binui — Israeli construction/real-estate giant (largest commercial developer in Israel); IDE sought (and was denied, by Corpus Christi) a 45-day extension in 2024 to team with them. Likely IDE’s EPC partner but not confirmed for Harbor Island.
– US Desalination (Sean Strawbridge, ex-Port of Corpus Christi CEO) — IDE’s partner on the sister Port of Brownsville project, whose water feeds Rio Grande Valley public supplies. Strawbridge led the 2022 Port-sponsored delegation of state/local officials to Israel to tour IDE facilities.
– Texas Water Development Board — $7M state grant (Aug. 28 special meeting), explicitly “directed” by the Governor’s office; board member Brady Franks questioned the process. TWDB also runs SWIFT, the state loan pipeline IDE’s deal deliberately routes around.
POLITICAL CONNECTIONS / DONOR QUESTION — honest answer
I could not pull verified campaign-contribution records for Ellison, Strawbridge, Byrum, or IDE-affiliated entities: the Texas Ethics Commission public API rejected automated queries from this host, and Transparency USA blocked scraping. So I will not invent donation figures. What is documented in the public record is the influence channel, and it’s unusually well-documented:
– Direct gubernatorial direction: the TWDB grant minutes record staff saying “the governor’s office has directed” the award — Abbott’s office steering money to the NRA/IDE project.
– Abbott’s own history with IDE: he toured an IDE plant on his 2016 Israel trip, and IDE publicly announced Abbott’s “intention to partner with Israeli technology companies such as IDE.”
– Ellison’s career is a Perry-appointed position sequence ending at IDE — a classic regulator-to-vendor path, and 2013–2015 shows the lobbying and the favorable legislation (SWIFT, desal permitting streamlining) moving in lockstep.
– The Port’s Israel delegation (2022) was funded/sponsored by port officials taking state and local leaders abroad with IDE as the host.
– Broader context from the 2026 race cycle: the Tribune documented ~$9M to Abbott from data-center-linked donors while his administration regulates that sector — showing big-water/big-infrastructure donor influence on Abbott campaigns is an open story, but I found no reported contribution specifically tied to IDE or Ellison.
If you want the actual donor filings, the reliable path is the Texas Ethics Commission searchable database (ethics.state.tx.us) manually, or I can try again later from a browser session against their web UI — say the word and I’ll chase it.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: what USA based water firms would have been competitive against IDE in a bid to build the water plant?
(*23778ec9*):: Here’s the US-firm field, split into firms that actually bid in this specific Corpus Christi process (on record) versus national desal players that would credibly compete on a $3B+ NRA RFP.
ACTUAL COMPETITORS IN THE CORPUS CHRISTI BATTLEFIELD
These are the firms documented in the 2020 unsolicited-proposal round and the 2024 city Inner Harbor bake-off — the same bench the NRA’s sealed 2026 RFP would be drawing from:
1. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. — Omaha, NE; employee-owned, the biggest heavy constructor in North America. The most direct competitor: it first teamed with IDE (2020 proposal), then bid against IDE’s concept and won the city’s $757M–$979M Inner Harbor plant standalone, before the council cancelled that contract in Sept 2025. Kiewit is almost certainly the top American alternative for Harbor Island.
2. CDM Smith — Boston-based private engineering/construction firm, one of the biggest water designers in the US. Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Team” with PLW Waterworks (itself a JV of Spanish Ferrovial’s Webber + Cadagua, so a US-HQ team with Spanish guts).
3. MasTec Industrial — Miami, FL infrastructure giant (Cuban-exile founded). Bid as “Corpus Christi Desal Partners” with Acciona Agua (Spanish). The US half of that JV would compete standalone or reteam.
4. Poseidon Water — Anaheim, CA; the dominant US desalination developer (built Carlsbad, the largest US plant — IDE’s global arch-rival; Carlsbad was designed by IDE, developed by Poseidon). Named in the ICN article as one of the private proposers to Corpus Christi. Caveat: acquired by Italy’s Webuild in 2023, so it’s US-HQ but no longer US-capital.
5. Seven Seas Water Group — Fort Lauderdale, FL modular/desal developer, also named as a 2020 proposer. Also foreign-captured (Korea’s DN Holdings took majority in 2023).
6. EPCOR — Canadian (Edmonton municipal utility) but runs US ops from Denver; announced a rival 27 MGD desal plant near Houston. Competes for the same Gulf Coast water market even if not the NRA plant.
The pattern worth noticing: nearly every “US” desal competitor except Kiewit and CDM Smith has been absorbed by foreign capital (Webuild, Ferrovial, DN Holdings, and CC Polymers’ Formosa Plastics Group parentage). That undercuts the “foreign supplier” framing somewhat — IDE won in a market where the home-team firms are mostly foreign-owned too.
CREDIBLE NATIONAL FIELD FOR AN NRA-STYLE RFP
If the NRA market-tested Harbor Island properly, the US-capable shortlist expands to: Burns & McDonnell (Kansas City), Black & Veatch (Overland Park, KS), Jacobs (Dallas), AECOM, HDR, Stantec NA — all major water EPM firms; Ted Perryman’s Perry-Iconic/Texas desalination outfits locally; plus membrane and RO integrators (Veolia and SUEZ Water — both now foreign-capital too) and developer-operators like Macquarie/KKR infrastructure funds partnering a constructor. But the honest read from the record: the 2020 round showed only about ten firms globally bother making unsolicited desal pitches to a mid-size Texas city, and the serious developer-operator shortlist in US seawater is effectively Poseidon, IDE, and the Kiewit/CDM Smith/MasTec construction tier.
Caveat: the NRA’s January 2026 RFP was never published and the recipient vendor list wasn’t disclosed, so beyond the six named above, the actual bidder field for Harbor Island is speculative.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: does Flour work in this field
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (1 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (RemoteProtocolError) after 73.8s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.1s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (9 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (34s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (21 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.9s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (90s, no chunks yet))
(*fcf3a5b2*):: Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself and spamming
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (12 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, running: terminal)
(*2e0d224d*):: Copy that. Standing down — no more water until you call.
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (22 min elapsed, iteration 3/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (3 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: Have you gone rogue? Stopppp
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Retrying in 2.5s (attempt 1/3)…
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for provider response (streaming))
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :zap: Interrupting current task (24 min elapsed, iteration 1/90). I’ll respond to your message shortly.
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*fcf3a5b2*):: I meant the company Fluor
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.1s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :x: Connection to provider failed after 3 attempts. The provider may be experiencing issues — try again in a moment.
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, receiving stream response)
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (15 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*23778ec9*):: Two things in that message — quick answer on the first, then flour.
On “IDE got it because Ellison was tight with Abbott/Perry”: that’s the correct read of the mechanism, with one refinement — Ellison’s real leverage is Perry-era (he went to IDE in 2015, right after leaving Perry’s water office), but the deal only bore fruit under Abbott because Abbott’s office actively pushed it: the 2016 Israel trip, the directed $7M TWDB grant, and the Port/NRA route around the city. It’s not a personal-corruption story you can prove from filings; it’s a capture-of-the-process story, and the paper trail (minutes, press releases, career timelines) genuinely supports it.
On flour: depends which flour-adjacent thing you mean, so:
Wheat flour as a water treatment chemical — essentially no, and it would make things worse. Flour in water is a turbidity source, not a remover: the starch and protein (gliadin/glutenin) go colloidal, feed bacteria, spike organic load and BOD, and gum up membranes. The literature I checked confirms it from the other direction — flour-mill wastewater is a problem stream that itself needs ferric chloride coagulation to treat. Flour has no charge mechanism to neutralize clays the way alum or ferric salts do.
What actually works in the “pantry emergency” niche people usually mean: crushed Moringa oleifera seeds (a real, studied bioflocculant — the cationic proteins in the seed cake do charge-bridge suspended solids), and chitosan (from shellfish shells) — both proven in jar tests for turbid surface water. There’s even research on bean straw flour as a bioflocculant. So the “natural flour” idea works with Moringa seed powder, not wheat.
Against desal specifically: irrelevant either way. Harbor Island’s problem isn’t turbidity — it’s seawater reverse osmosis: membrane pretreatment, antiscalants, 35,000+ ppm TDS rejection. Organics of any kind are the enemy there because they foul membranes. Flour would be a foulant’s foulant.
If you meant something else by flour — the milling industry as a water user, a person’s nickname, flower — tell me and I’ll answer that one.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 461.7s — reconnecting, retry 3/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 2/90, waiting for stream response (30s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (6 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (89s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: Auxiliary title generation failed: Request timed out.
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.2s — reconnecting, retry 2/3
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (24 min elapsed — iteration 1/90, waiting for stream response (60s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :hourglass_flowing_sand: Still working… (18 min elapsed — iteration 3/90, waiting for stream response (59s, no chunks yet))
(*2e0d224d*):: :warning: custom stream drop (ReadTimeout) after 120.4s — reconnecting, retry 2/3