#general

February 4, 2025

Tue Feb 4 19:32:05 2025
(*a3a26d18*)::

 Mostly the argument seems "we adore and support trump, regardless of the logic or lack of, we have his back".

 Mostly the argument seems "we adore and support trump, regardless of the logic or lack of, we have his back".

 Mostly the argument seems "we adore and support trump, regardless of the logic or lack of, we have his back".

 Mostly the argument seems "we adore and support trump, regardless of the logic or lack of, we have his back".

Nobody said that
(*2405d2f7*):: To be clear – I didn’t say anyone said that. It is just my take-away from the thread leading up to it. I’m asking why Canada? Because it is politically expedient.. and.. well I don’t see much so that was one of my take-aways. But as Joe said it is “moot”.
(*a3a26d18*):: Ya but I’m going to be hypocritical here. I assume you know the phrase assume only makes an ass out of u and me
(*2405d2f7*):: no, can’t say I do know the phrase… or understand it.
(*a3a26d18*):: “assume” Ass u me
(*b4c3b42a*):: how can you possibly have been around for almost half a century without hearing that before
(*a3a26d18*):: LOL
(*a3a26d18*):: YOU SAID THAT. What fucking world do you live in? That was literally a quote from you. I truly don’t know how to respond to this.
(*a3a26d18*):: I’m not trying to be rude, honestly. I’m just literally mind blown
(*a3a26d18*):: This happened an hour ago
(*2405d2f7*):: Hmm? I am not sure. this was from 12 hours ago and we’d moved on. I’m really confused. I asked you guys about this whole weird-ass Canadian thing. Then I saw much back and forth about why Canada sucsk but it was nothing substantial. Nothing that (to me) justified the starting of a tradewar with our closest ally. So I said “mostly the argument seems to be ” … and like.. you said no one said that. I agreed but clarified again that it was my take-away.
(*2405d2f7*):: and then 12 hours later you’re thrown into some chasm of not being able to comprehend ? buddy you lost me as much as you are lost.
(*2405d2f7*):: yea, I don’t know that much about either. The normal press doesn’t have them on the bad guy list and doesn’t cover them so much… and I limit my reading elsewhere.. I recogize the Pierre name and know Trudeau is on the outs .. and hes some form of a big liberal
(*a3a26d18*):: I said this earlier. I don’t agree on the tariffs, except with Jina
(*4cfb807c*):: Here’s an event idea, its a space where EM frequencies are jammed, and none of your devices work, 1 football field sized park.
(*b4c3b42a*):: there are significant logistical challenges with this. for starters, RF jamming is illegal even on private property in the US.
(*54b3f3ac*):: No one would go anyway as everybody is glued to their screens for 8 hours a day basically.. Especially if they’re under 30 something
(*a3a26d18*):: Regarding to “I didn’t say anyone said that” ^^
(*a3a26d18*):: I’ll respond to this llater. I have to wake up in 3 hours or my wife will kill me
(*a3a26d18*):: its 5 am here
(*2405d2f7*):: I’m ok applying them to Mexico to some degree because it might apply the incentives correctly.. but honestly everyone is scared of the cartels.. so I don’t know. They might need to bring in US military to fuck them up. Maybe this is the first step in that direction.. I’d be ok with that if Mexico’s government is ok with it. Treat them as “terrorists” (god I hate using that word in legal senses) but yea…
(*a3a26d18*):: my wife actually gave me some suga today
(*a3a26d18*):: \
(*a3a26d18*):: I got baby duty because of it
(*2405d2f7*):: Yea, ain’t much to talk about anyway.. I’m over it but if someone wants to engage sure whatever
(*a3a26d18*):: I got my time mixed up. It feels like it just happened. I took a nap
(*a3a26d18*):: The one thing working / living remotely is time zones are completely arbitrary
(*a3a26d18*):: it feels like I just had this conversation
(*a3a26d18*):: Every day Windows gives me time in Central time. Slack gives me a different time. People ask for meetings in different time
(*4cfb807c*):: Idgaf if its illegial, and of course they would, its novel, new to them and an experience
(*2405d2f7*):: Yea, dunno, the Canadian thing pisses me off. And to see everyone rally behind it but not be able to justify it just irks me… LIke I was hoping there was something more to it I didn’t understand because you guys are far more tuned into this sort of thing than I am.
(*a3a26d18*):: to be fair though, I took a nap and am a little retarded
(*a3a26d18*):: Can you explain to me what Trump’s doing to Canada? I genuinely don’t know
(*4cfb807c*)::

(*2405d2f7*):: So I start reading more into it and giving my opinion about how could people be behind that…. like with all the fucking issues in the world. I was trying to see how much of an issue Canada actually is.. like.. whatever. Anyway, it is moot. I could dig further into the actual concessions and determine if they actually are meaningful or if it was just a cynical political play by the ‘lets make a deal’ guy… but meh thats something to do on my own
(*54b3f3ac*):: While I appreciate your optimism I still don’t think it’s very realistic. Plus the feds would be in their sofast to arrest whoever started it
(*2405d2f7*):: just rando 25% tarriffed their exports
(*a3a26d18*):: Based on that Trudeau resigned and that Pierre Poilievre is most likely to become the next prime minister, I can’t imagine them having problems
(*2405d2f7*):: which is the first salvo of a trade war.. which like I said elsewhere, I’m ok with .. but I want to understand why and the logic behind them. Some people on here seem to think tarriffs are auto-win for the USA… but uhhhh
(*2405d2f7*):: To be clear – I didn’t say anyone said that. It is just my take-away from the thread leading up to it. I’m asking why Canada? Because it is politically expedient.. and.. well I don’t see much so that was one of my take-aways. But as Joe said it is “moot”.
(*a3a26d18*):: Ya but I’m going to be hypocritical here. I assume you know the phrase assume only makes an ass out of u and me
(*2405d2f7*):: no, can’t say I do know the phrase… or understand it.
(*a3a26d18*):: “assume” Ass u me
(*b4c3b42a*):: how can you possibly have been around for almost half a century without hearing that before
(*a3a26d18*):: LOL
(*a3a26d18*):: YOU SAID THAT. What fucking world do you live in? That was literally a quote from you. I truly don’t know how to respond to this.
(*a3a26d18*):: I’m not trying to be rude, honestly. I’m just literally mind blown
(*a3a26d18*):: This happened an hour ago
(*2405d2f7*):: Hmm? I am not sure. this was from 12 hours ago and we’d moved on. I’m really confused. I asked you guys about this whole weird-ass Canadian thing. Then I saw much back and forth about why Canada sucsk but it was nothing substantial. Nothing that (to me) justified the starting of a tradewar with our closest ally. So I said “mostly the argument seems to be ” … and like.. you said no one said that. I agreed but clarified again that it was my take-away.
(*2405d2f7*):: and then 12 hours later you’re thrown into some chasm of not being able to comprehend ? buddy you lost me as much as you are lost.
(*a3a26d18*)::

 Mostly the argument seems "we adore and support trump, regardless of the logic or lack of, we have his back".

Nobody said that
(*2405d2f7*):: yea, I don’t know that much about either. The normal press doesn’t have them on the bad guy list and doesn’t cover them so much… and I limit my reading elsewhere.. I recogize the Pierre name and know Trudeau is on the outs .. and hes some form of a big liberal
(*a3a26d18*):: I said this earlier. I don’t agree on the tariffs, except with Jina
(*a3a26d18*):: Regarding to “I didn’t say anyone said that” ^^
(*a3a26d18*):: I’ll respond to this llater. I have to wake up in 3 hours or my wife will kill me
(*a3a26d18*):: its 5 am here
(*2405d2f7*):: I’m ok applying them to Mexico to some degree because it might apply the incentives correctly.. but honestly everyone is scared of the cartels.. so I don’t know. They might need to bring in US military to fuck them up. Maybe this is the first step in that direction.. I’d be ok with that if Mexico’s government is ok with it. Treat them as “terrorists” (god I hate using that word in legal senses) but yea…
(*a3a26d18*):: my wife actually gave me some suga today
(*a3a26d18*):: \
(*4cfb807c*):: Here’s an event idea, its a space where EM frequencies are jammed, and none of your devices work, 1 football field sized park.
(*b4c3b42a*):: there are significant logistical challenges with this. for starters, RF jamming is illegal even on private property in the US.
(*54b3f3ac*):: No one would go anyway as everybody is glued to their screens for 8 hours a day basically.. Especially if they’re under 30 something
(*4cfb807c*):: But yes all valid considerations, some least-illegal service denial method
(*4cfb807c*):: You get what I mean
(*4cfb807c*):: Doubtful, jamming is pretty localized, if it was a pirate party and spontaneous, there would be no real way to know the source
(*4cfb807c*):: We can’t always get what we want in the world by being nice little compliant rule followers, there is not gain, even cultural gain, without risk
(*4cfb807c*):: And its just mala prohibita, i think not being near an airport would also be smarter than dumber lol
(*4cfb807c*):: Or hospital
(*4cfb807c*):: Frankly the city is what needs it the most though
(*4cfb807c*):: There probably is a decent service denial method through other means i just cant think of it atm
(*4cfb807c*):: Idgaf if its illegal, and of course they would, its novel, new to them and an experience

Post Views: 30